reamary, on May 16 2011, 05:19 AM, said:
I disagree. If you want big legs, or big anything for that matter, weight lifting is the only option. Of course, you can build up muscles without it, but that would be a different kind of muscle definition. Runners and cyclists do have muscular legs but they're very different from those of a bodybuilder. You just have to know what it is you actually want. I, for one, have big and thick legs, so I don't use a lot of weight. I need definition, not size. Of course, that's where nutrition comes in...
Btw, I wanted to put in my two cents to the whole abs discussion. The phrase "abs are made in the kitchen" falls into the same size/definition category. For instance your chest, arms e.t.c. do get a lot bigger when you stress them enough and you notice the positive change in the body even if you don't change your nutrition. That's not the case with abs, however. Abs can't get a lot bigger, that's why if you don't change the way you eat, all those crunches will do practically nothing for you.
Sign In
Create Account








Back to top














