Jump to content

Divas Live 98, unedited ?


Recommended Posts

Posted

So knock on the forehead can be only you - and not just on your face!

Can you please let us all give the source of the serious "real source" about Celine giving up the honor of Arethe?

And leave these kids emoticons for someone else.

If you can not communicate properly so learn it!

So again Even Grammy's did not report anything.!

 

Read better: he said "just a thought/ an idea"

  • Like 2

»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» MATHIAS ««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzPrxI0AIDY

Posted

Video alert!!! CelineAndRene posted the undubbed versions on his/her channel. Here is Natural Woman, but there are the other performances of Celine too from that night on the channel :wub: :wub: :wub:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EenjVHjyGLI

 

Thanks!

 

Notice that Céline was the only one using a wired mic (already then)... :giggle:

  • Like 1

»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» MATHIAS ««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzPrxI0AIDY

Posted

Video alert!!! CelineAndRene posted the undubbed versions on his/her channel. Here is Natural Woman, but there are the other performances of Celine too from that night on the channel :wub: :wub: :wub:

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EenjVHjyGLI

 

At 2.43 you see Aretha sing when it should have been Carole. Aretha was over singing so much, drowning the others out. She tried with Celine but we all know what happened 🤣

  • Like 5
Posted

At 2.43 you see Aretha sing when it should have been Carole. Aretha was over singing so much, drowning the others out. She tried with Celine but we all know what happened

 

I think Carol was (also) supposed to begin the song... she didn't get any opportunity to shine (in her own song) coz of Aretha.. :unsure:

  • Like 3

»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»»» MATHIAS ««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««««

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NzPrxI0AIDY

Posted

 

 

sorry and you read better

idea is not real information .

and see it all before.

 

 

And who said it was real information?? At no point did anyone say it was happening its called an idea and weve been discussing the possibility of Celine making a tribute to Aretha. Stop being so aggressive for no reason

  • Like 2
Posted

 

 

I think Carol was (also) supposed to begin the song... she didn't get any opportunity to shine (in her own song) coz of Aretha.. :unsure:

 

Yes she was. Carole was extremely patient! Even at the beginning when Aretha sang “would you forgive me if I didn’t sing this song “ - well it wasn’t just Aretha who should be singing it! And people had the nerve to say Celine was disrespectful for singing over Aretha. That always bugged me.

  • Like 1
Posted

Yes she was. Carole was extremely patient! Even at the beginning when Aretha sang "would you forgive me if I didn't sing this song " - well it wasn't just Aretha who should be singing it! And people had the nerve to say Celine was disrespectful for singing over Aretha. That always bugged me.

 

It wasn't Arethas show. Never been a fan of Aretha and I found her annoying in Divas.

I don't know why people thought Aretha was so entitled. Céline did great :)

  • Like 1
Posted

Do you know what will be in November ?!

you have a program - what will Celine do?

Nobody do not know exact dates when finally released a new album, single or music video

and you already know what will be in November? .

 

Yes, we do.

 

Clive Davis' Aretha tribute in NY is being held on Nov 14th.

Celine's schedule for the fall has also been confirmed and includes a date on Nov 14th.

 

Hence putting 2 and 2 together and this. Celine might be divine but she's not yet holy enough to be physically present in two places at once.

 

No need to be unduly aggressive.

Posted

 

 

Yes, we do.

 

Clive Davis' Aretha tribute in NY is being held on Nov 14th.

Celine's schedule for the fall has also been confirmed and includes a date on Nov 14th.

 

Hence putting 2 and 2 together and this. Celine might be divine but she's not yet holy enough to be physically present in two places at once.

 

No need to be unduly aggressive.

 

 

Yeah i was only suggesting. It would be cool if she did a live stream through satellite of an Aretha song. She could even pre record one like she did with Si Dieux Existe for Claude Dubois special. Maybe she wont which would be a bit sad, but she could even just replace the Prince medley with Aretha songs.... if she does nothing i might be like.... a little dissapointed since she did it with prince before he even passed

Posted
She doesn't need to perform the songs of every artist who passes just for publicity. Paying her respects as she has done and is doing privately is fine.
  • Like 7
Posted

Yes, we do.

 

Clive Davis' Aretha tribute in NY is being held on Nov 14th.

Celine's schedule for the fall has also been confirmed and includes a date on Nov 14th.

 

Hence putting 2 and 2 together and this. Celine might be divine but she's not yet holy enough to be physically present in two places at once.

 

No need to be unduly aggressive.

 

 

And especially here is not the name of Celine!

And that is the essence of all this.

so do not cross the question I asked

And especially nobody here is aggressive.

you are obviously used to speculation

I just wanted - the source was enough to give it to all fans.

just because the song "Natural Woman"

It does not mean that Celine will sing either directly or via satellite there!

which was the only way to sing more singers and not just Celine (now it was Ariana Grange in Show Jimmy Fellon.)

it does not mean that Celine will be singing either directly or through a satellite!

And this is just a general article about the honor of Aretha .

 

 

And especially I do not understand

why are you still convinced that Celine should still give up somebody's honor.

Because it makes nonostop - Celine, in her career, gives honor to the artist all the time.

Whether it's on her tour or show in Las Vegas.

Posted

Sorry...what?

 

Please read message above.

You seem to be confused about the point being made.

Posted

She doesn't need to perform the songs of every artist who passes just for publicity. Paying her respects as she has done and is doing privately is fine.

 

Very true! I just want the Prince tribute to go now lol

As much as I think an Aretha segment could work, I think she’d have more fun doing a Tina segment. She already does RDMH. Not sure she’d sing NW completely live nowadays either.

  • Like 2
Posted

She doesn't need to perform the songs of every artist who passes just for publicity. Paying her respects as she has done and is doing privately is fine.

 

Yes. I really don't like that idea.

Posted

 

 

Very true! I just want the Prince tribute to go now lol

As much as I think an Aretha segment could work, I think she’d have more fun doing a Tina segment. She already does RDMH. Not sure she’d sing NW completely live nowadays either.

 

Could she still do NW like she did it on Letterman back in the day?

That one note lasted forever! Where does she hide those lungs?! 😱

  • Like 1
Posted

OMG.. I just can't.....LOL

 

What’s the joke?

Posted

Yes she was. Carole was extremely patient! Even at the beginning when Aretha sang "would you forgive me if I didn't sing this song " - well it wasn't just Aretha who should be singing it! And people had the nerve to say Celine was disrespectful for singing over Aretha. That always bugged me.

 

Wow, Aretha really did take over the whole thing, didn't she? :wtf: Not to discredit her achievements, but she sure does come across as awfully overbearing in that performance. Good on Celine for holding her own.

  • Like 2
Posted

And especially here is not the name of Celine!

And that is the essence of all this.

so do not cross the question I asked

And especially nobody here is aggressive.

you are obviously used to speculation

I just wanted - the source was enough to give it to all fans.

just because the song "Natural Woman"

It does not mean that Celine will sing either directly or via satellite there!

which was the only way to sing more singers and not just Celine (now it was Ariana Grange in Show Jimmy Fellon.)

it does not mean that Celine will be singing either directly or through a satellite!

And this is just a general article about the honor of Aretha .

 

 

And especially I do not understand

why are you still convinced that Celine should still give up somebody's honor.

Because it makes nonostop - Celine, in her career, gives honor to the artist all the time.

Whether it's on her tour or show in Las Vegas.

Actually, you are being super aggressive, and it is actually hard to understand what your point is. What's your problem?

He just said it would be great to have Celine participate to sing in Aretha's honor, like she did for Michael Jackson or Whitney. Nothing more, and nothing is set in stone yet for the tribute. He's not speculating or whatever.

 

That being said, if Celine does a tribute, it'd better be in person or nothing.

  • Like 1
Posted

 

Whats the joke?

I don't think it was meant for you.

 

I hate the Prince tribute and I've never seen it live. I kinda wish she would stop with the tribute and do her own stuff

 

Sent from my SM-G950F using Tapatalk

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted

Of course, a different view is a manifestation of aggression.

Make a bit of a distinction between concepts and impressions ...

 

And yes Celinesi Aretha honored through a link on her Instagram, Twitter and Facebook.

And sometimes it is enough and as follows.

I repeat Celine once again, every time she performs, or at the show or tour, she always gives tribute to the artist (whether Prince, Tina Turner, Elvis or Adele, Sia ....).

Posted

 

 

What’s the joke?

 

Just realized my post is under your post. I didn't laugh at your post. Sorry.

Posted

Where is Ken Erlich when you need him? This guy needs to organize a reunion show of all the original divas to pay tribute to Aretha.

With Céline, Carol, Mariah, Shania, and Gloria or at least penn all of them for a tribute at this upcoming Grammys.

  • Like 2
Posted

Of course, a different view is a manifestation of aggression.

Make a bit of a distinction between concepts and impressions ...

How is this not aggressive?

So knock on the forehead can be only you - and not just on your face!

Can you please let us all give the source of the serious "real source" about Celine giving up the honor of Arethe?

And leave these kids emoticons for someone else.

If you can not communicate properly so learn it!

So again Even Grammy's did not report anything.!

The English is very bad and what you're saying is hardly understandable, but it is very aggressive... I honestly don't understand why the aggressiveness though.

Posted

How is this not aggressive?

 

The English is very bad and what you're saying is hardly understandable, but it is very aggressive... I honestly don't understand why the aggressiveness though.

 

I asked politely - the response was rude (knock on forehead - emoticons)

Instead of a decent answer.

You are attacking here now only to me.

But the whole discussion is of no concern to you.

The base has gone

And whoever does not understand, will never understand

Posted

 

 

I asked politely - the response was rude (knock on forehead - emoticons)

Instead of a decent answer.

You are attacking here now only to me.

But the whole discussion is of no concern to you.

The base has gone

And whoever does not understand, will never understand

 

 

 

 

I think you will find that you were already being aggressive before the emoticons,

 

 

 

Hmmm .... OK ...

 

Do you know what will be in November ?!

you have a program - what will Celine do?

Nobody do not know exact dates when finally released a new album, single or music video

and you already know what will be in November? .

Even Grammy's did not report anything.

 

 

not to mention that directly underneath the emoticons, i had posted a full explanation and yet you were still aggressive. Not to mention youre being rude, you cannot dictate who can and cannot respond to this discussion saying that its no concern of his/hers is really rude.

Posted

I think you will find that you were already being aggressive before the emoticons,

 

 

 

 

not to mention that directly underneath the emoticons, i had posted a full explanation and yet you were still aggressive. Not to mention youre being rude, you cannot dictate who can and cannot respond to this discussion saying that its no concern of his/hers is really rude.

 

Our proverb.

"Who wants to beat a dog, stick finds"

 

 

I responded to your sentence that you wrote.

And I normally asked you.

Completely without insults

 

Instead of a real argument, the emoticons came.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...