CélineI'mAlive Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:42 AM Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:42 AM I call this good teamwork! Quote
CélineI'mAlive Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:43 AM Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:43 AM Céline is like a little girl. Quote
CélineI'mAlive Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:45 AM Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:45 AM The new Spider-Man!🤣 Quote
CélineI'mAlive Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:46 AM Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:46 AM Céline, secret agent 007 Quote
CélineI'mAlive Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:52 AM Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:52 AM High quality images Quote
CélineI'mAlive Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:53 AM Posted June 3, 2026 at 04:53 AM High quality images (Probably many of you will know these images, but I’m uploading them not because they are rare, but because it’s rare to find HQ photos of Céline) 1 Quote
fab Posted June 3, 2026 at 08:40 AM Posted June 3, 2026 at 08:40 AM On 6/2/2026 at 9:55 PM, fab said: 1 Quote http://www.pixenli.com/images/mini/1300306790033470900.pngFabricee-clinedion
fab Posted June 3, 2026 at 08:42 AM Posted June 3, 2026 at 08:42 AM On 6/3/2026 at 6:40 AM, CélineI'mAlive said: Celine&René This couple 😍😍😍 2 Quote http://www.pixenli.com/images/mini/1300306790033470900.pngFabricee-clinedion
drove all night Posted June 3, 2026 at 01:46 PM Posted June 3, 2026 at 01:46 PM A little mixture from here and there found recently while searching something completely different: 1 Quote
fab Posted June 3, 2026 at 05:59 PM Posted June 3, 2026 at 05:59 PM Quote http://www.pixenli.com/images/mini/1300306790033470900.pngFabricee-clinedion
fab Posted June 4, 2026 at 08:29 AM Posted June 4, 2026 at 08:29 AM I am so curious to see the unrealeased photo she is pregnant 😍it was for the book ma vie mon rêve Quote http://www.pixenli.com/images/mini/1300306790033470900.pngFabricee-clinedion
drove all night Posted June 4, 2026 at 01:47 PM Posted June 4, 2026 at 01:47 PM (edited) On 6/4/2026 at 10:29 AM, fab said: I am so curious to see the unrealeased photo she is pregnant 😍it was for the book ma vie mon rêve Oh yes, those surfaced in 2024 with the exhibition at the McCord Stewart Museum in Montreal "Portraits and Fashion - Quebec Photographers Beyond Borders". Among the exhibited photographers were also works of Monic Richard who not only took the picture for the book and the pregnant Céline but also the cover for "D'Eux" in 1994. https://www.musee-mccord-stewart.ca/en/exhibitions/portraits-and-fashion/ PS: Dear "fab", I've written you a PM some days ago, would you please be so kind to answer! Thank you! Edited June 4, 2026 at 01:48 PM by drove all night 2 Quote
drove all night Posted June 4, 2026 at 06:43 PM Posted June 4, 2026 at 06:43 PM Grammy's 1993 Source: https://www.instagram.com/p/DZJXu39yv8N/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link&igsh=MzRlODBiNWFlZA== 3 Quote
ryba Posted June 5, 2026 at 01:11 PM Posted June 5, 2026 at 01:11 PM Funny how Celine and Mariah sat next to each other I wonder why there was never a collaboration Quote
CélineI'mAlive Posted June 5, 2026 at 05:12 PM Posted June 5, 2026 at 05:12 PM (edited) On 6/3/2026 at 10:42 AM, fab said: This couple 😍😍😍 This image is AI Edited June 5, 2026 at 05:12 PM by CélineI'mAlive Quote
drove all night Posted June 5, 2026 at 06:59 PM Posted June 5, 2026 at 06:59 PM On 6/5/2026 at 7:24 PM, CélineI'mAlive said: This is crap!!! A new way of AI-sh** : to have tools which declare real pictures as AI-fake! THIS PICTURE IS REAL! IT'S TO BE SEEN IN THE OFFICIAL PROGRAM OF THE "SUMMER TOUR 2016"! 4 1 Quote
blacktooth Posted June 6, 2026 at 04:04 AM Posted June 6, 2026 at 04:04 AM Hahaha again this angry mad woman / man! (or whatever) You're missing the point entirely. Nobody is claiming that the original photo from the official tour book is fake. The issue is whether the version being shared here has been AI-enhanced, AI-upscaled, or AI-reconstructed from that original source. A real photograph can absolutely be used as the basis for an AI-generated enhancement. The authenticity of the source does not automatically make every version of that image authentic or untouched. What makes this even more ironic is that you're usually the first person to complain whenever AI-generated images appear. Yet in this case, you've already accepted and defended several AI-enhanced images posted in this thread simply because they originated from an official publication. Being from an official publication does not prevent an image from being altered later. You're confusing the authenticity of the original source with the authenticity of the version being presented. Those are two completely different things. Instead of mocking people who are pointing out obvious signs of AI enhancement, it might be worth considering that you've already been fooled by some of these images yourself. You hate AI so much huh? Keep defending it! 1 Quote
blacktooth Posted June 6, 2026 at 04:07 AM Posted June 6, 2026 at 04:07 AM On 6/6/2026 at 1:24 AM, CélineI'mAlive said: 100% yes! This thread already contains AI-generated photos, yet this old woman has no idea that she's been completely fooled into believing they're real. 1 Quote
CélineI'mAlive Posted June 6, 2026 at 01:38 PM Posted June 6, 2026 at 01:38 PM On 6/6/2026 at 6:04 AM, blacktooth said: ¡Jajaja otra vez esta mujer / hombre enfadado y enfadado! (o lo que sea) Estás perdiendo completamente el punto. Nadie está afirmando que la foto original del libro oficial de la gira sea falsa. La cuestión es si la versión que se comparte aquí ha sido mejorada por IA, ampliada por IA o reconstruida por IA a partir de esa fuente original. Una fotografía real puede usarse sin duda como base para una mejora generada por IA. La autenticidad de la fuente no hace automáticamente que todas las versiones de esa imagen sean auténticas o intactas. Lo que hace esto aún más irónico es que normalmente eres la primera persona en quejarse cada vez que aparecen imágenes generadas por IA. Sin embargo, en este caso, ya has aceptado y defendido varias imágenes mejoradas por IA publicadas en este hilo simplemente porque provienen de una publicación oficial. Pertenecer a una publicación oficial no impide que una imagen sea alterada posteriormente. Estás confundiendo la autenticidad de la fuente original con la autenticidad de la versión que se presenta. Son dos cosas completamente diferentes. En lugar de burlarse de quienes señalan señales evidentes de mejora por IA, quizá valga la pena considerar que tú mismo ya has sido engañado por algunas de estas imágenes. You hate AI so much huh? Keep defending it! Thank you very much! You definitely seem like one of the only people here with common sense. I don’t think we should pay any attention to it—I Drove All Night or whatever her name is is always angry. Then they tell us off for sharing our findings privately. 1 Quote
CélineI'mAlive Posted June 6, 2026 at 01:44 PM Posted June 6, 2026 at 01:44 PM On 6/5/2026 at 8:59 PM, drove all night said: This is crap!!! A new way of AI-sh** : to have tools which declare real pictures as AI-fake! THIS PICTURE IS REAL! IT'S TO BE SEEN IN THE OFFICIAL PROGRAM OF THE "SUMMER TOUR 2016"! As Blacktooth says, the photo doesn’t actually appear in that book—in fact, you yourself have shown it. It doesn’t even appear on that page of the book. Also, it’s clearly visible that the photo is AI-generated. Celine’s face in that photo is distorted and shows coloring and pigmentation typical of AI. It’s curious that you’re usually against AI photos and now you’re not. Maybe just to be contrary? Quote
fab Posted June 6, 2026 at 04:44 PM Posted June 6, 2026 at 04:44 PM On 6/5/2026 at 7:12 PM, CélineI'mAlive said: This image is AI 🤣🤣🤣 so Celine have used ai in her tourbook ? 🤣 ok 1 Quote http://www.pixenli.com/images/mini/1300306790033470900.pngFabricee-clinedion
blacktooth Posted June 6, 2026 at 06:48 PM Posted June 6, 2026 at 06:48 PM On 6/6/2026 at 9:44 PM, CélineI'mAlive said: As Blacktooth says, the photo doesn’t actually appear in that book—in fact, you yourself have shown it. It doesn’t even appear on that page of the book. Also, it’s clearly visible that the photo is AI-generated. Celine’s face in that photo is distorted and shows coloring and pigmentation typical of AI. It’s curious that you’re usually against AI photos and now you’re not. Maybe just to be contrary? I think you may have misunderstood my point. My previous comment was focused on the second point. If the image shows signs of AI reconstruction, facial distortion, artificial skin texture, or other AI artifacts, that would actually support the possibility that the shared version has been processed by AI. So my position has not changed. I've consistently been concerned about distinguishing original photographs from AI-altered versions. I'm simply trying to determine the origin of the image and whether AI was used to modify it, not defend the authenticity of the version being shared. Quote
CélineI'mAlive Posted June 6, 2026 at 10:32 PM Posted June 6, 2026 at 10:32 PM On 6/6/2026 at 8:48 PM, blacktooth said: Creo que quizá has malinterpretado mi punto. Mi comentario anterior se centraba en el segundo punto. Si la imagen muestra signos de reconstrucción por IA, distorsión facial, textura artificial de piel u otros artefactos de IA, eso en realidad apoyaría la posibilidad de que la versión compartida haya sido procesada por IA. Así que mi postura no ha cambiado. Siempre me ha preocupado distinguir las fotografías originales de las versiones modificadas por IA. Simplemente intento determinar el origen de la imagen y si se usó IA para modificarla, no defender la autenticidad de la versión que se está compartiendo. That photo is 100% AI-generated. I use a reliable detector validated by Spanish universities. Another matter is whether it was based on an original image, but as any dedicated Céline fan would argue, it has no value whatsoever as a photograph of Céline unless it is 100% original. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.