Célinefull Posted July 30, 2007 at 09:10 AM Posted July 30, 2007 at 09:10 AM Now, carrying on, I must say that Faith Hill is beautiful regardless of the digital post-production edits of her photographs.To me, she still looks like Faith, before AND after the adjustments. I disagree with you, I think the difference is pretty much noticeable... It makes her look much thinner, and on young teens' minds, I believe it can make a difference.I think you misinterpreted what I said. What I meant to say was that I did not have to look twice to see if that was Faith Hill or not. She's recognizable and is apparently a beautiful with or without digital edits. It's not like they turned her from an oompa loompa. It's probably redundant to argue word class with majority second language English users. However English is one of the only languages that accepts the fluidity of word class, so technically it's not considered wrong. In particular due to the fact that it's considered part of the technical language lexicon of computer users (under which standard syntax doesn't apply). Frankly I don't agree with photoshop being the devil...most of what they did there was adjust the light, fix her skin tone, her dress at the back because it was puffing out and her hair to make the picture look perfect. With the amount of money at stake here, I can understand why magazine's would want the pictures to be 100% in every way. The cover is what sells the magazine, no one is going to buy a magazine that has Faith Hill looking hot mess on the front cover, that's the reality of society whether people accept it or not. Quote http://img695.imageshack.us/img695/7108/ziegfieldgirlbanner.jpg
Bellamy Posted July 30, 2007 at 10:35 AM Posted July 30, 2007 at 10:35 AM In particular due to the fact that it's considered part of the technical language lexicon of computer users (under which standard syntax doesn't apply).That's right. There're many "new" words in new edition of dictionaries. Quote Please support the forum by ordering everything through our special Amazon.com link Click here. Thank you!
Bellamy Posted August 7, 2007 at 05:04 PM Posted August 7, 2007 at 05:04 PM Hear's the real Mariah Carey perfume ad. I can't find her in the ad at all. http://img181.imageshack.us/img181/8589/83682733mc5.jpg Quote Please support the forum by ordering everything through our special Amazon.com link Click here. Thank you!
Love, Posted August 7, 2007 at 06:40 PM Posted August 7, 2007 at 06:40 PM Honestly, Bellamy, that is A BEAUTIFUL, and ABSOLUTELY STUNNING photographic composition. But did Mariah have to strip? Quote
Bellamy Posted August 8, 2007 at 12:12 AM Posted August 8, 2007 at 12:12 AM Honestly, Bellamy, that is A BEAUTIFUL, and ABSOLUTELY STUNNING photographic composition. But did Mariah have to strip?But I can't recognize HER body from the photo. Quote Please support the forum by ordering everything through our special Amazon.com link Click here. Thank you!
Céline's Blues Posted August 8, 2007 at 12:21 AM Posted August 8, 2007 at 12:21 AM Honestly, Bellamy, that is A BEAUTIFUL, and ABSOLUTELY STUNNING photographic composition. But did Mariah have to strip?But I can't recognize HER body from the photo. They just took this: http://www.centennial.k12.mn.us/gle/lablinks/HbkWhale.gif and photoshopped it a little so that it goes along better with her Ms. Piggy head. http://www.wayodd.com/funny-pictures2/funny-pictures-save-the-whale-0tp.jpg Quote http://i.imgur.com/dmreJ.jpg
denise Posted August 8, 2007 at 12:44 AM Posted August 8, 2007 at 12:44 AM Honestly, Bellamy, that is A BEAUTIFUL, and ABSOLUTELY STUNNING photographic composition. But did Mariah have to strip?But I can't recognize HER body from the photo. They just took this: http://www.centennial.k12.mn.us/gle/lablinks/HbkWhale.gif and photoshopped it a little so that it goes along better with her Ms. Piggy head. http://www.wayodd.com/funny-pictures2/funny-pictures-save-the-whale-0tp.jpg OMFG! Quote http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y260/nycbrat/celine/FadeAway_Sig.jpg <OBJECT classid="clsid:D27CDB6E-AE6D-11cf-96B8-444553540000" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,0,0" WIDTH=240 HEIGHT=90><PARAM NAME=movie VALUE="style_images/donationlavendar.swf"><PARAM NAME=menu VALUE=false><PARAM NAME=quality VALUE=high><PARAM NAME=wmode VALUE=opaque><PARAM NAME=scale VALUE=noscale><EMBED src="style_images/donationlavendar.swf" menu=false quality=high wmode=opaque scale=noscale WIDTH=240 HEIGHT=90 TYPE="application/x-shockwave-flash" PLUGINSPAGE="http://www.macromedia.com/shockwave/download/index.cgi?P1_Prod_Version=ShockwaveFlash"></EMBED></OBJECT>
Esty Posted August 8, 2007 at 08:48 AM Posted August 8, 2007 at 08:48 AM Honestly, Bellamy, that is A BEAUTIFUL, and ABSOLUTELY STUNNING photographic composition. But did Mariah have to strip?But I can't recognize HER body from the photo. They just took this: http://www.centennial.k12.mn.us/gle/lablinks/HbkWhale.gif and photoshopped it a little so that it goes along better with her Ms. Piggy head. http://www.wayodd.com/funny-pictures2/funny-pictures-save-the-whale-0tp.jpg Yep, that's definitely not her body. And whom does she want to sell her perfume to naked like that? Quote
christelle83 Posted August 8, 2007 at 10:30 AM Posted August 8, 2007 at 10:30 AM she beautiful women, i like faith in real.is dommage ;o)))) Quote http://www.pour-bientot.com/3819206-1190628554.png
dj4celine Posted August 8, 2007 at 05:38 PM Posted August 8, 2007 at 05:38 PM Honestly, Bellamy, that is A BEAUTIFUL, and ABSOLUTELY STUNNING photographic composition. But did Mariah have to strip?But I can't recognize HER body from the photo. They just took this: http://www.centennial.k12.mn.us/gle/lablinks/HbkWhale.gif and photoshopped it a little so that it goes along better with her Ms. Piggy head. http://www.wayodd.com/funny-pictures2/funny-pictures-save-the-whale-0tp.jpg OMFG! LOL Quote
Love, Posted August 10, 2007 at 08:59 AM Posted August 10, 2007 at 08:59 AM Now, carrying on, I must say that Faith Hill is beautiful regardless of the digital post-production edits of her photographs.To me, she still looks like Faith, before AND after the adjustments. I disagree with you, I think the difference is pretty much noticeable... It makes her look much thinner, and on young teens' minds, I believe it can make a difference.I think you misinterpreted what I said. What I meant to say was that I did not have to look twice to see if that was Faith Hill or not. She's recognizable and is apparently a beautiful with or without digital edits. It's not like they turned her from an oompa loompa. It's probably redundant to argue word class with majority second language English users. However English is one of the only languages that accepts the fluidity of word class, so technically it's not considered wrong. In particular due to the fact that it's considered part of the technical language lexicon of computer users (under which standard syntax doesn't apply). Frankly I don't agree with photoshop being the devil...most of what they did there was adjust the light, fix her skin tone, her dress at the back because it was puffing out and her hair to make the picture look perfect. With the amount of money at stake here, I can understand why magazine's would want the pictures to be 100% in every way. The cover is what sells the magazine, no one is going to buy a magazine that has Faith Hill looking hot mess on the front cover, that's the reality of society whether people accept it or not. :yes: Quote
qqxkind Posted February 3, 2008 at 01:38 AM Posted February 3, 2008 at 01:38 AM (edited) nelemy said:I agree... confused.gif It's shameful ! So many girls get desperate when they read those magazines... angry.gif They give people the image of an ideal that doesn't even exist. pinch.gifYea, I can gaurantee that Faith doesn't look like the photoshopped pic. I've seen her MANNNNY times live, and she looks like the real deal. :hmm:and I dont agree just look at the girl above ,she really seems too have a perfect body and that without any potoshophelp I mean this one http://i166.photobucket.com/albums/u89/whitneyyclaire/images/drawinghearts.jpg Edited February 3, 2008 at 01:44 AM by qqxkind Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.