Jump to content

Google Forced To Give Viacom Video Logs


Recommended Posts

Posted
Google Forced To Give Viacom Video Logs, But Can Keep Search Source Code

 

Mountain View (CA) - Viacom won a significant victory in their $1 billion copyright infringement case against Google/YouTube. Google has been ordered to hand over terabytes of video search information that shows the details of every video ever played on YouTube. However Google did dodge a huge bullet as Judge Louis Stanton denied Viacom’s request for source code to Google’s search engine.

 

Viacom says it wanted the video logs to prove whether copyright-protected videos were more heavily watched than amateur clips. Viacom attorneys offered to provide Google hard drives to store the 12 terabytes of data. While the logs will be sanitized to protect real names and email addresses, they will still include the time a video is played, the login id and the IP address.

 

Google’s attorneys tried to block the request on privacy grounds, but Stanton argued that IP addresses aren’t accurate enough to provide the true identity of the video viewer. Google has also been ordered to provide copies off all videos that have ever been removed from YouTube.

 

Viacom contends Google’s YouTube infringes on its works on a massive scale and that the online video site isn’t just providing storage space for the videos. The company contends that YouTube commits "duplication, distribution and public display" when a video is watched. Furthermore, Viacom attorneys insist that the video is copied to the computer (in cache) after it is played, something which perpetuates the piracy.

 

But while Google was forced to give up video logs, the judge denied Viacom’s request for Google’s and YouTube’s search engine source code. Google claimed the code represented 1000 man years of development time and said divulging the code would be risking the loss of Google’s core business. Viacom countered by saying it wanted to prove that Google manipulated the code to treat copyrighted material differently, but Judge Stanton didn’t buy that argument.

 

Viacom also wanted Google’s advertising schema database which contains all the advertising companies and amounts charged for ads within YouTube. This request was also denied by Judge Stanton because he didn’t think it was relevant to the case.

 

http://www.tomsguide.com/us/Google-Viacom-...,news-1869.html

 

Viacom sucks!!!! :angry2:

Please support the forum by ordering everything through our special Amazon.com link

Click here. Thank you!

Posted
So what are they going to do w/ the IP addresses? -_-
http://cdn.webecoist.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/modern-pet-solo-blown-glass.jpg
Posted
So what are they going to do w/ the IP addresses? -_-

Sue everyone who watches copy right stuff. -_-

Please support the forum by ordering everything through our special Amazon.com link

Click here. Thank you!

Posted
Viacom will have to coordinate with countless service providers all over the world to trace the addresses, won't they? :huh: And like what is said in the article, IP addresses are not direct proof of copyright violations. Not unless, of course, if the user has an account w/c is something I don't have.
http://cdn.webecoist.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/modern-pet-solo-blown-glass.jpg

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...